New top story on Hacker News: A word used only by Postgres developers
A word used only by Postgres developers
37 by ccleve | 3 comments on Hacker News.
I came across a word in the Postgres source code that I'd never seen before: "frammish". https://ift.tt/0JSdeP5 : > Therefore, they offer both exclusive and shared lock modes (to support > read/write and read-only access to a shared object). There are few other > frammishes. User-level locking should be done with the full lock manager > --- which depends on LWLocks to protect its shared state. It sort of makes sense in context, as a "feature" or a "flourish". It also appears on the pg_hackers mailing list: > There has been some talk of separating the power to create new users > from the power of being superuser (although presumably only a superuser > should be allowed to create new superusers). If the planned pg_role > rewrite gets submitted before the 8.1 feature freeze, I might look at > adding that frammish into it. and here, from 19 years ago: > And we get ragged on regularly for the non-SQL-standard features we've > inherited from Berkeley Postgres (eg, the implicit-FROM frammish that > was under discussion yesterday). No amount of googling turns up a formal definition or usage outside of the Postgres community. "frammish.org" doesn't seem to be related. Are Postgres developers starting to evolve their own dialect? Should we call an anthropologist?
37 by ccleve | 3 comments on Hacker News.
I came across a word in the Postgres source code that I'd never seen before: "frammish". https://ift.tt/0JSdeP5 : > Therefore, they offer both exclusive and shared lock modes (to support > read/write and read-only access to a shared object). There are few other > frammishes. User-level locking should be done with the full lock manager > --- which depends on LWLocks to protect its shared state. It sort of makes sense in context, as a "feature" or a "flourish". It also appears on the pg_hackers mailing list: > There has been some talk of separating the power to create new users > from the power of being superuser (although presumably only a superuser > should be allowed to create new superusers). If the planned pg_role > rewrite gets submitted before the 8.1 feature freeze, I might look at > adding that frammish into it. and here, from 19 years ago: > And we get ragged on regularly for the non-SQL-standard features we've > inherited from Berkeley Postgres (eg, the implicit-FROM frammish that > was under discussion yesterday). No amount of googling turns up a formal definition or usage outside of the Postgres community. "frammish.org" doesn't seem to be related. Are Postgres developers starting to evolve their own dialect? Should we call an anthropologist?
No comments